Investing: Is Buy-and-Hold the Only Way?

NYSE

Traditional investing claims that any attempt to time the market or actively trade to gain an advantage will most likely not work.  In fact, many articles have been written to tell you that any success that is achieved by actively trading is only a short term phenomenon.  Additionally, this out-performance will not sustain itself.  But is this actually the case?  Surely someone has figured out a better way of investing than to simply watch your accounts move up-and-down with the economy?

Bear with me.  We need to draw the question out a little further. Unfortunately, a simple answer to these questions is only likely to confuse the issue.  Furthermore, the simple answer will fail to actually identify what is being asked.

Here is what typically happens.  A person who reads articles in various publications that addresses methods for investing, are often only seeing articles that are taking into consideration one number, “average return.” Whenever you read things like “86% of active large-cap fund managers failed to beat their benchmarks” the measure that’s being considered is the “average return.” Articles with titles like this tend to lead people to ask the next obvious question, “So who are the 14% who did beat the benchmarks?”

Passive fund managers, and 401(k) plan providers who favor Index Funds, push the idea that “average return” is the only thing investors should be concerned about.  And it is easy to agree with them.  In fact, I dare to say that in any given 15 or 20 year time frame, if you the reader, were to look at your investment accounts and try to decide which account you were most happy with, you would undoubtedly point to the one which provided the best “average return.”  So just give me a list of the 14% of fun managers who did beat their benchmarks!

Here’s the problem, it doesn’t matter who the 14% are.

The Problem With Average Return in Retirement

I’m going to provide you with two investments where something other than the “average return” is more important to you.  Consider the performance of the following two portfolios while taking withdrawals from your account.

If you are retirement age, it is past time to consider something other than “average return.”  What you will notice on the chart provided above, is that the “average return” rate for Portfolio A is higher at 7.59% than the 6.77% for Portfolio B.  Yet, because of the extra investment performance volatility of Portfolio A, Portfolio A lands almost $300,000 short of Portfolio B.

The reason that this happens is simple to understand.  If I have $100,000 and I intend on taking out $5,000 and then I have a portfolio loss of -50%.  Now my account is down to $50,000.  In this circumstance, if I still take out the $5,000 I was originally planning to spend, its as if I’ve taken out $10,000 on a $100,000 investment.

$5,000 / $50,000 = 10%
$10,000 / $100,000 = 10%

Additionally, recovery does not happen in a linear fashion.  If you lose 50% of your investment, you have to get a 100% return just to get back to even.  Imagine that you have $100.00 you lose 50%, or $50.  Now you have to double the $50 just to get back to even.

Average Returns Can be Deceptive

Consider the S&P 500 Price Return Index.  Morningstar reports SPX an average return of 4.86 over the last 15 years.  The question is this: “How many times in the last 15 years has the S&P 500 Price Return Index returned 4.86% +/- 2%.  Meaning, between 2.86% and 6.86%.”

The answer: Twice.  2 out of 15 or 13.33% of the time.  Average returns are unpredictable and can lead to mistakes made by investors.  Furthermore, the push by those who favor passively managed funds often cite data that essentially states that the average return is the only thing an investor should care about.  Unfortunately, this attitude may unwittingly put investors at risks that they are unaware of, seeking higher returns, not considering the risk being taken to get those returns.

What Measures Should Be Considered When Investing?

Not all active fund managers do very well.  But there are important statistics like Alpha, which measures the excess risk adjusted return, that can be used to judge an active fund manager’s performance.  By using Alpha, you can more accurately determine if a fund manager is getting more return for the amount of risk that they’re taking compared with a benchmark.  Compare, for example, the Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) with the S&P 500 Total Return Index.  FCNTX has an Alpha of 1.8% for the last 10 years.  Which means that for the level of risk that is being taken, FCNTX is earning about 1.8% more per year on average.  Utilizing investment advisors who understand how to read risk-adjusted measures of performance can be a critical way to overcome the average return trap in investing.

Save

Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Careers CEOs Companies Education Entertainment Legal Politics Science Sports Technology
Chitresh Sharma
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Chitresh Sharma
Target
Does Target Drug Test All Its Employees?
Ted Williams
The Five Most Expensive Boston Red Sox Jerseys Ever Sold
Collectibles Credit Cards Investing Real Estate Stocks
stock market
Is MGNI Stock a Solid Long Term Investment?
Baltimore Orioles
The 10 Most Expensive Baltimore Orioles Baseball Cards Ever
Stock
Is SPAQ Stock a Solid Long Term Investment?
Aviation Boats Food & Drink Hotels Restaurants Yachts
Peruse the Stalls at the Puerto de Frutos
The 20 Best Things to Do in Tigre, Argentina
La Croix Sparkling Water
The 10 Best Sparkling Water Brands in the World
Through the Old Town
The 20 Best Things to do in Hastings, England
BMW Bugatti Cadillac Ferrari Lamborghini Mercedes Porsche Rolls Royce
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan: An Enduring Love Affair
1999 Subaru Legacy Outback Wagon
The 10 Best Station Wagons of the 90s
E85 gas
What is E85 Gas and What is it Used For?
BMW Motorcycles Buell Ducati Harley Davidson Honda Motorcycles Husqvarna Kawasaki KTM Triumph Motorcycles Yamaha
2022 Harley-Davidson Fat Boy 114
A Closer Look at The 2022 Harley-Davidson Fat Boy 114
2022 Bimota KB4
A Closer Look at The 2022 Bimota KB4
2002 Triumph Speed Triple
Remembering The 2002 Triumph Speed Triple
Electronics Fashion Health Home Jewelry Pens Sneakers Watches
Nike Air Max 95
10 Sneakers that Epitomized 90s Fashion
Moritz Grossmann Tremblage Watch
A Closer Look at the Moritz Grossmann Tremblage Watch
D1 Milano Ultra-Thin
The 10 Best Microbrand Watches Money Can Buy
Jawed Karim
How Jawed Karim Achieved a Net Worth of $160 Million
Renee Zellweger
How Renee Zellweger Achieved a Net Worth of $90 Million
The 10 Richest Crypto Billionaires in the World
Jeffrey Dean Morgan
How Jeffrey Dean Morgan Achieved a Net Worth of $12 Million