First Class Cabins May Eventually Be Mixed with Economy Seats

As airlines continue to work on airplane design to decrease fuel costs and increase flight speeds, there are a number of ideas flying around. In fact, there is actually an awards ceremony, the Crystal Cabin Awards, that encourages competition from several sectors of the airline industry to come up with innovative exterior and interior aircraft design. One of the award winners was a Korean student who proposed the concept of mixing First Class with Economy.

The basic concept is to design the interior to be more efficient with space, in part by combining the concept of a windowless exterior and using the newly acquired space to move some of the Economy rows along the windowless side. The First Class seating would be alongside, or in some cases, literally on top of the Economy rows to maximize the use of space. Of course, First Class would have their windows, and they would have partitions for privacy as is currently common in many First Class and Business Class sections.

In the end, the result of these rearranged passenger sections would be to maximize airline profit by potentially increasing seating capacity (mostly for Economy) and saving money on reduced fuel costs. There was not much attention paid to the customer end of the concept, which will be briefly discussed next.

For the customer financial end, there doesn’t seem to be much benefit from a physical seating perspective because as most Economy Frequent Flyers know, things are as about as small as they can be. Expanding the size of the Economy seat area will be financially counterproductive to the concept since it would fit the same number of passengers – or fewer. Airlines would make more profit without significantly improving the customer experience, hardly a reason for most passengers to get excited about.

There is also a psychological component to the concept that many flyers, especially those from the United States, will have difficulty in dealing with unless they have a First Class ticket. Imagine an Economy passenger having to look across the aisle and seeing a privacy partition closed. A simple psychological interpretation is that the Economy passenger is economically segregated from those in a higher economic status. The current plane designs have curtains or other physical partitions that prevent passengers in Economy and below from having to look at what they’re not experiencing. All Economy passengers see is other Economy passengers.

We can complicate the situation more if a scenario occurs when a First Class passenger invites someone from across the Economy section for a sit down. That’s not allowed? Now we are starting to get into additional regulations and conditions for First Class passengers, an especially difficult problem when there are additional seats available after takeoff.

Finally, there is the space issue. Americans in particular love more space, and in this context it is interesting a non-Western designer created the concept. Anyone who has been to or just seen videos of Japan knows that space is a premium. Flying for 5 or 6 hours in a cramped space is not the preferred choice for most Americans. So while the concept may be viable for certain parts and destinations around the world, there definitely will be areas and locations that will avoid such airplanes like a captain avoids a bird strike.

As a basic design concept, the idea has potential. Putting First Class on top of Economy is an idea, but it just seems it’s like having to live in the bottom apartment of a two story building. The idea of privacy partitions to separate the classes, which will be the perception, has to be kept out of the design. As for the windowless exterior, not only do aircraft manufacturers have to buy into the idea, but there is the critical issue of passenger and aircraft safety that has to be addressed by the FAA and other international agencies.

One can only hope that the issue of passenger classes can be resolved to the benefit of everyone. As a matter of profit margin per plane, First Class seats are responsible for a fair amount of the per flight profit. So reducing the number of the higher priced seats will reduce the profit of the airline, resulting in rising costs for the Economy passengers. There must be a reason why airlines cannot strike a balance between having an aircraft specifically designed for only Economy passengers, and one for First Class passengers only. Perhaps that can be considered at the next Crystal Cabin Awards.



Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Chipotle
The History and Story of the Chipotle Logo
Gucci
The History and Story Behind the Gucci Logo
Herman Houser
10 Things You Didn’t Know About Hermann Hauser
Etsy
The History of and Story Behind the Etsy Logo
REIT
What Does “Adjusted Funds From Operations” Mean?
REIT
Should You Consider Gaming REITs for Your Portfolio?
REIT
What is a Low Income REIT and Should You Invest in One?
REIT
The Five Best REIT IPOs of the Last Decade
Balboa Bay Resort
The 10 Best Places to Stay in Newport Beach
Lido Bottle Works
The 10 Best Places to Eat in Newport Beach, CA
Twin Falls, Idaho
A Traveler’s Guide to Hiking in Twin Falls, ID
Towneplace Suites
The 10 Best Places to Stay in Twin Falls, ID
Ferrari Station Wagon
Is There Such A Thing As A Ferrari Station Wagon?
Ferrari 550 Maranello
A Buyer’s Guide to the Ferrari 550 Maranello
Used Ferrari 456 4
The Buyer’s Guide To Getting a Used Ferrari 456
Ferrari 612 Scaglietti
How to Get Your Hands on a Ferrari 612 Scaglietti
Breitling Navitimer
A Buyer’s Guide To Getting a Used Breitling Navitimer
The Five Best Breitling Crosswind Watches Money Can Buy
Breitling
The Five Best Diamond Breitling Watches Money Can Buy
Breitling
The Five Best Black Breitling Watches of All-Time
Michael Blakey
How Michael Blakey Achieved a Net Worth of $60 Million
Skip Bayless
How Skip Bayless Achieved a Net Worth of $13 Million
Channing Tatum
How Channing Tatum Achieved a Net Worth of $80 Million
Maynard James Keenan
How Maynard James Keenan Achieved a Net Worth of $60 Million