How AI Will Disrupt SaaS Business Models

It has been less than a decade since Salesforce paved the way for the now de facto enterprise software as a service (SaaS) business model, which advocates for subscription-based pricing. Key to this model is the premise that the productivity of an enterprise is proportional to the size of the workforce and therefore software can be distributed based on headcount. This is all poised to fundamentally change in the new era of enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) applications.

AI is arguably the most sought after new capability in the enterprise. In the coming years, the effects of AI will be propagated across sales, customer support, marketing and virtually all important operational aspects of running a business. With over 40% of enterprise companies now piloting these capabilities, the traditional enterprise SaaS vendors are adapting to these needs and deploying new offerings – Salesforce with Einstein, Oracle with Intelligent Bots, Microsoft with Azure Cognitive Services. Each of these companies has built a distribution model around seat-based pricing, where revenues increase as more people in the workforce use the vendor’s software. But what happens when AI product capabilities start to increase the output of employees, reducing the need for more seats? This is the dilemma that many SaaS vendors are beginning to deal with.

AI brings efficiency to digital technologies. Whether it be emailing a customer, analyzing a marketing campaign, or segmenting a sales pipeline, people can do more when augmented with AI. In industries like customer support, we’re seeing call center agents able to handle 30% more conversations with assisted AI. While this is generally good news for businesses, the vendors that service these companies will find a new challenge ahead in the sales department. Specifically, the Chief Revenue Officer will need to innovate on the business model to keep up with the innovation happening with the product. Said bluntly, why would a Salesforce account representative promote Einstein if it’s going to reduce the number of seats on an account renewal? This is a fundamental misalignment that will need to change.

A better approach would be to have the sales team aligned with the product offering. With AI at the core of new SaaS products, a natural alternative to seat-based pricing is to price based on performance. This can be done in a number of ways. One approach would be to transactionalize the work so that software is sold in units of measurable outcomes. LivePerson (NYSE:LPSN) provides a good example of this in their new LiveEngage platform. Whereas LivePerson has traditionally sold seats of their software to customer support departments, with LiveEngage, companies now pay a fee for each conversation that the company has with a customer. This allows LivePerson to align with AI partners that increase the productivity of support agents who would otherwise conflict by reducing the need to purchase more seats.

Transaction-based pricing models are also interesting because they align with longer term trends in hyper-specialization, where work is increasingly being discretized into microtasks for the workforce. If we consider this change in business model along a spectrum, we can observe that this is merely a continuation toward taylorism. Where SaaS moved the enterprise software industry away from site licenses and provided more granularity into procurement, transaction-based offerings will go deeper. Ultimately, this will be advantageous to all parties. Having measurable alignment between software tools and the workforce will drive utilization because companies will be able to better quantify the return on investment (ROI) of their software deployments and invest accordingly.

The next wave of enterprise SaaS vendors will begin offering new pricing models that align with their AI products. We can expect to see a shift away from per seat models toward models that promote ROI and utilization. This is one of the many changes we can expect to see as AI matures across industries. For enterprise SaaS vendors, the price game has been reset. Off to the races.


Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Jane Fonda
How Jane Fonda Achieved a Net Worth of $200 Million
William Burr
How Bill Burr Achieved a Net Worth of $8 Million
Why is Health Insurance So Expensive?
James Lico
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Fortive CEO James Lico
The 20 Most Expensive Stocks in 2019 By Share Price
Advice on Obtaining a Credit Card as a College Student
Takeaways from The 2019 Student Card Survey from Creditcard.com
American Tower
Why American Tower is a Solid Long-Term Dividend Stock
20 ‘Smart’ Technologies That Will Be Available Before We Know It
embedded personal devices
Where are We With Embedded Personal Devices?
20 Smartphone Technologies That Will Blow You Away
bullets that change direction
Where are We With Bullets that Change Direction?
WOW Air
The 20 Worst Airlines in the World in 2019
Swift and Sons
The 20 Best Steakhouses in Chicago
Caladesi Island
The 20 Best Beaches in Florida in 2019
Why La Cosecha Argentinian Steakhouse is One of Miami’s Finest Steakhouses
Land Rover Discovery
The 20 Worst Resale Value Cars of 2019
Hybrid Cars
The 20 Best Hybrid Cars of All-Time
Rolls Royce Silver Seraph
The Rolls Royce Silver Seraph: A Closer Look
The Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit
The Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit: Its History and Its Evolution
A Closer Look at the Hublot Bigger Bang
IWC Big Pilot's Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince
A Closer Look at the IWC Big Pilot’s Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince
A Closer Look at the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Tourbillon
Time Traveling: The Hublot Classic Fusion Zirconium