It Might Not Be Easy to Destroy Incoming Asteroids

A recent study carried out by researchers at John Hopkins University has revealed that asteroids might be stronger than what was thought, which in turn, means that they will need greater force to be shattered. This might not have much immediate relevance, but it is nonetheless something that has managed to capture widespread interest because of its potential consequences for the future.

First and foremost, it is important to note that this new revelation came about because while scientists have an excellent understanding of a wide range of physical materials at the scales that one can expect to see in their laboratories, it can be rather difficult for them to use that understanding to make predictions about those same materials at much, much bigger scales. Unfortunately, they have little choice in the matter because the bigger the scale, the more expensive and thus the more impractical it becomes for them to study something in person rather than build models for the same purpose. Of course, models can have flaws for a wide range of reasons, which in turn, means that there is plenty of room for improvement.

In this case, it used to be believed that bigger objects would be easier to break up because bigger objects meant an increased chance of flaws that can be exploited for said purpose. However, the model used to come up with that conclusion was simpler than the one created by the researchers at John Hopkins University, which was able to account for smaller-scale processes such as the limited speed at which cracks spread throughout the asteroid. Due to this, the new model has produced a very different result for a scenario in which a kilometer-wide asteroid slams into a 25-kilometer-wide asteroid at an impact velocity of 5 kilometers per second. In the earlier model, this would have shattered the target asteroid. However, the new model suggests that while the impact would cause serious damage throughout the target asteroid including its core, it wouldn’t be enough to shatter it in any meaningful sense.

Why Does This Matter?

This new revelation won’t have much relevance for most people in the immediate time frame. However, it could have important consequences for those who are thinking further out.

First, while there are no life-wiping asteroids headed towards the Earth that we know about at this point in time, there is nonetheless the potential for such an occurrence. For proof, look no further than the K-T Extinction that wiped out the non-avian dinosaurs along with 75 percent of all the animal and plant species that could be found on the Earth at around 66 million years ago, which is believed to have been caused by either an asteroid or a comet impact. Something that is supported by the existence of a 180-kilometer-wide crater called the Chicxulub Crater that can be found beneath the Yucatan Crater in Mexico.

As a result, if the human species wants to be able to survive a similar scenario, it makes sense for scientists to look into the kind of strength needed to shatter an incoming asteroid, which has a number of potential uses. For example, knowing the kind of strength needed to achieve the desired outcome could help interested parties decide whether it would be better to hit the incoming object hard enough to break it up or hard enough to send it off-course from the Earth. Likewise, such information would be invaluable for avoiding one potential outcome when the intent was to seek the other.

Besides this, said information has potential uses in asteroid mining as well, which is something that has managed to build up a fair amount of interest because of the huge amount of mineral wealth that can be found in the objects in our own solar system. Theoretically, knowing the kind of strength needed to shatter an asteroid would be very useful for getting more convenient access to the mineral wealth found within it, though of course, this kind of information won’t have practical usefulness until far, far into the future. After all, we don’t even have a moon base at the moment. Never mind being able to reach the asteroid belt that is situated between Mars and Jupiter.

Regardless, this new revelation is an interesting reminder that there are still new insights to be uncovered even in fields that seem familiar to us. As a result, it will be interesting to see what else scientists will uncover as they continue to investigate the rest of the cosmos in search of answers.


Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

JD Byrider
How JD Byrider Became a Leading Auto Giant
George Carlin
20 George Carlin Quotes That Apply to Business
Bob Ross
20 Bob Ross Quotes That Apply to Business
Pat Brown
10 Things You Didn’t Know About Impossible Foods CEO Pat Brown
State of Oregon
How to Apply for Unemployment in Oregon
Outback Steakhouse
Is Bloomin Brands a Solid Long Term Investment?
American Airlines
Is American Airlines Stock A Solid Long Term Investment?
stocks
Is Fabrinet a Solid Long Term Investment?
Ocean Drive
The 20 Best Things to do in Newport, RI For First Timers
Lake Merritt
The 20 Best Things to Do in Oakland, CA for First Timers
The 20 Best Hotels in Tucson, AZ
Riviera Palm Springs
The 20 Best Hotels in Palm Springs
Volvo's Polestar
Volvo’s Polestar May Be the Four-Door Electric Car of the Future
2021 Genesis GV80
10 Things You Didn’t Know About the 2021 Genesis GV80
2021 Hyundai Elantra 2
10 Things You Didn’t Know About the 2021 Hyundai Elantra
2020 Audi Q5 Hybrid
The 10 Most Efficient Small Hybrid SUVs
Orrery Tourbillon REF. 2GGBP.U01A
The 10 Best Graham Watches Money Can Buy
Junghans Meister Pilot Chronscope Watch Black Dial Numerals 0273590.00
The 10 Best Junghans Watches Money Can Buy
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Moller Watches
The Iconic No. 1 by TID
The 20 Best Minimalist Watches for Men
Sting
How Sting Achieved a Net Worth of $400 Million
Brooke Baldwin
How Brooke Baldwin Achieved a Net Worth of $1.5 Million
Sam Elliott
How Sam Elliott Achieved a Net Worth of $12 Million
Jake Tapper
How Jake Tapper Achieved a Net Worth of $10 Million