Robots Are Being Used to Shoo Away the Homeless in San Francisco

As a person who deals with the homeless on a regular basis, I am very close to their plight and understand that there are many influences that lead to their current state, with mental illness being at the top of the list. What I can tell you is that the homeless population is as close to being invisible as a group of people can be, so when I heard that the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) was using a robot to shoo away homeless people who might attempt to set up camp near their building, I was somewhat put back.

First, there is the irony of a group that is dedicated to protecting animals from acts of cruelty using a robot to shoo away homeless people. The disconnect that we experience daily in this world is widening, and that is for those of us who have roofs over our heads. To think that using a machine to run people off your property is humane is cause for concern. Don’t get me wrong, it is both, cost-effective and expedient, but the lack of personality and the inability to make judgment calls can have long-reaching negative effects.

The robot being used is a prototype created by Knightscope, a Silicon Valley startup. The robot, which I must admit is not that imposing from a physical perspective, has been programmed to patrol a specific stretch of sidewalk that runs in front of the San Francisco SPCA office. The robot also has the capacity to detect what can be considered criminal activity and alert the building security.

It seems that I am not the only one who believes that using a robot is not the best method for dealing with the homeless population, as the City of San Francisco has issued a cease and desist order to the SPCA ordering them to stop using the robot to manage the homeless population near their property. There is also the reason for concern, with several notable mishaps being reported concerning the machine. In one instance, a robot ran over a child’s foot in California, and another fell into a pond.

Knightscope’s business model is to develop affordable robotics that they will ultimately rent and lease out to the public for as little as $7.00 per hour. This is significant because that is less than the minimum wage in this country, and $3.00 below the minimum wage in California. Uber is currently taking a lot of heat for using the robots in the San Francisco area.

When it comes to using these robots to control areas populated by humans, homeless or not, there seems to be a certain dichotomy to the argument against it. Not only does it appear to be inhumane, but it eliminates job opportunities for security personnel. Even with the advancement of artificial intelligence, it is not likely that a robot rented for $7.00 per hour will have the ability to make situational decisions, which should be a requirement when operating in areas populated by humans.

Well, that is only one side of the equation. While the city of San Francisco and I both agree that robots should not be used to manage a populated area, not everyone agrees. In fact, there are some investors with very deep pockets who have used some of that money to endorse the idea of integrated robotics and artificial intelligence by investing $15 million into Knightscope’s vision.

As a side note, it seems that the San Francisco SPCA attempted to mitigate the pushback it would receive by adorning the robot it used to control its homeless intruders with stickers of kittens and puppies. To me, it has the opposite effect. The stickers are a reminder of the lengths the organization will go to protect animals (which I support by the way), but at the same time treat the homeless population with disrespect.

With many of these individuals suffering from some form of mental defect, including PTSD, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia and more, it is impossible to determine how they will respond to the robot forcing them to leave the area. This could lead to an escalation of violent or disruptive behavior that would be less likely with a human. Nevertheless, this is not likely the last time we will be hearing about this. It is only round one.

Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Careers CEOs Companies Education Entertainment Legal Politics Science Sports Technology
Payroll
20 Things You Didn’t Know about Pinwheel
Dude Perfect
The 10 Richest Youtubers in 2021
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Chris Zhu
Collectibles Credit Cards Investing Real Estate Stocks
Boston Red Sox
The 10 Most Expensive Boston Red Sox Baseball Cards of All Time
Cleveland Indians
The 10 Most Expensive Cleveland Indians Baseball Cards of All Time
Stock
Is Lucid Stock a Solid Long Term Investment?
Aviation Boats Food & Drink Hotels Restaurants Yachts
Hard Kombucha
The 10 Best Hard Kombucha Money Can Buy
Hurricane
How the Hurricane Cocktail Got Its Name
Adare Manor
The 20 Best Hotels in All of Ireland
BMW Bugatti Cadillac Ferrari Lamborghini Mercedes Porsche Rolls Royce
2022 Volkswagen Arteon
A Closer Look at the 2022 Volkswagen Arteon
2021 Subaru Outback Premium
The 10 Best Subaru Outback Models of All-Time
2020 GMC Yukon Denali
The 10 Best GMC Yukon Models of All-Time
BMW Motorcycles Buell Ducati Harley Davidson Honda Motorcycles Husqvarna Kawasaki KTM Triumph Motorcycles Yamaha
Triumph Thruxton 1200 R
A Closer Look at The Triumph Thruxton 1200 R
2022 Honda ADV350
A Closer Look at The 2022 Honda ADV350
2022 Yamaha YZ125
A Closer Look at The 2022 Yamaha YZ125
Electronics Fashion Health Home Jewelry Pens Sneakers Watches
Target Stores
Does Target Take EBT Payments?
TAG Heuer Carrera Calibre 5
A Closer Look at The TAG Heuer Carrera Calibre 5
Nike Vaporwaffle
What is a Nike Vaporwaffle?
Julie Bowen
How Julie Bowen Achieved a Net Worth of $18 Million
Jennifer Coolidge
How Jennifer Coolidge Achieved a Net Worth of $6 Million
Mannie Fresh
How Mannie Fresh Achieved a Net Worth of $15 Million
Charli D'Amelio and Dixie D'Amelio
The 10 Richest TikTokers in 2021