What Would “Regulation” for Facebook Even Look Like?

Facebook has been the focus of both public and government attention both in the United States and abroad, in the wake of the Russian fake news scandal and the revelation of how little control Facebook users had over their own privacy. Make no mistake, Facebook does not create a product or service to the general public, yet has said repeatedly to those same customers that it will always be a free website.

The negative attention has cost Facebook some of its customers, with people preferring to keep as much as their privacy as possible. Though the recent announcement of Google shutting down its Gmail+ attempt at a social media network does not appear to have any connection with the issues of Facebook, there is a growing discontent of why nobody knows what actually is going on behind the servers of Facebook.

What the company deals in is personal data, and it sells it to the highest bidder – sort of. The problem for governments and regulators is how to rein in the business from what the U.K. calls being a “digital bully.” Though Facebook has increased the levels of privacy a user can choose when using the app, it appears not too many people are that terribly concerned with the public dissemination of their data.

But unlike monopolies of a more traditional natures such as landline telephone service, if Facebook is considered to be a monopoly how should it be regulated? Here are a few potential problems.

First, the use of Facebook is voluntary, as are the user’s choices of privacy settings. It is unfair to regulate Facebook to the point that it indirectly regulates its users be determining what level of privacy Facebook should be required to offer. If I want to tell the world about the size of my underwear, that is between me and Facebook – not the government.

Second, there is the problem of data security. If a user authorizes Facebook to make its data available to anyone, how exactly can a data breach be defined beyond the user’s personal profile data? It’s like trying to claim that allowing the geophysical location of your address to be made public is a violation of the law. Most people couldn’t begin to guess what their own is, and yet the same people are voluntarily giving up that information to third parties. If that type of data is breached, is there really a breach at all? It would seem that Facebook would stand to lose far more than its users in such a case.

Third, let’s assume that Facebook is found guilty of being an international monopoly and must be broken up. How exactly is this supposed to be accomplished? Based on the recent number of Facebook users who remained loyal to the brand, how many users would be willing to accept a potentially lesser quality of service for a service they pay absolutely zero dollars for? Again, this is not your typical monopoly scenario.

Britain’s legislators have declared that Facebook and other digital bullies must not be allowed to continue growing exponentially without some type of legal restriction. Even if you agree with this statement, and it does make a lot of sense, there are two major problems that make creating regulations very difficult if not impossible. Facebook, Google, and the like likely already know this.

One is that the companies have already become so large, so profitable, and so complex that it will take years to figure out what type of regulation would actually have a meaningful impact. The more than 200 billion Facebook users are not likely to turn off their connections with their families and distant relatives because a government decides to believe it poses an economic danger.

Another is that most legislators simply do not have the business or technology background to understand how the technology works. Most elected officials have no basic knowledge of technology except in a limited use. They range from bartenders to lawyers in terms of education, but very few have a degree in a technology-related field. This greatly increases the likelihood any legislation created would have gaping loopholes that would render the legislation useless.

There may be no immediate way to regulate Facebook or any of the behemoth digital bullies in the immediate future. Any attempt at regulation must begin with legislators becoming intimately acquainted with what they are up against. Until then, the data control companies will continue to have control of every growing amounts of data.

Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Avery Dennison CEO
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Avery Dennison CEO Mitchell Butier
Vladimir Putin
What is The Net Worth of Vladimir Putin?
Jane Fonda
How Jane Fonda Achieved a Net Worth of $200 Million
William Burr
How Bill Burr Achieved a Net Worth of $8 Million
The 20 Most Expensive Stocks in 2019 By Share Price
Advice on Obtaining a Credit Card as a College Student
Takeaways from The 2019 Student Card Survey from Creditcard.com
American Tower
Why American Tower is a Solid Long-Term Dividend Stock
20 ‘Smart’ Technologies That Will Be Available Before We Know It
embedded personal devices
Where are We With Embedded Personal Devices?
20 Smartphone Technologies That Will Blow You Away
bullets that change direction
Where are We With Bullets that Change Direction?
Royal Caribbean
The 10 Best Cruise Lines in the World in 2019
The 20 Worst Airlines in the World in 2019
Swift and Sons
The 20 Best Steakhouses in Chicago
Caladesi Island
The 20 Best Beaches in Florida in 2019
Rolls Royce Phantom VI
Rolls Royce Phantom VI: A Closer Look
Land Rover Discovery
The 20 Worst Resale Value Cars of 2019
Hybrid Cars
The 20 Best Hybrid Cars of All-Time
Rolls Royce Silver Seraph
The Rolls Royce Silver Seraph: A Closer Look
A Closer Look at the Hublot Bigger Bang
IWC Big Pilot's Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince
A Closer Look at the IWC Big Pilot’s Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince
A Closer Look at the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Tourbillon
Time Traveling: The Hublot Classic Fusion Zirconium