Should Investors Ever Consider a One Stock Retirement Plan?


Some people might have heard about a man named Alexander Green touting his so-called single stock retirement plan at the Oxford Club. For those who are unfamiliar, the claim is that interested individuals can become multimillionaires by investing their money in a single secret $3 stock that is expected to see explosive growth in the near future. Something that is used to convince them to sign up as soon as possible so that they can capitalize on the opportunity as well. Very understandably, most people tend to be rather skeptical of such claims. Furthermore, they would be right to be so because the indication is that the secret $3 stock hasn’t managed to live up to its hype. In short, Green has never stated its name in public, but he has provided a lot of information about it, so much so that Stock Gumshoe was able to guess that it was Foxconn. Unfortunately, while Foxconn is a legitimate company that has seen a fair number of successes, its stock performance has shown no signs of explosive growth. As such, it seems safe to say that the so-called “single stock retirement plan” is a dud for the time being.

Having said that, it is very far from being the sole example of a one stock retirement plan that can be found out there. After all, there are a lot of people who want to maximize their money while minimizing their expended effort, which in turn, means that there are a lot of people searching for the perfect stock. The problem is that this is a very risky plan, thus making it unsuitable for most people when it comes to their retirement plans.

Should Investors Ever Consider a One Stock Retirement Plan?

Generally speaking, most people want stability when it comes to their retirement. In more concrete terms, this means that they want to have enough money to cover their expected costs, thus enabling them to avoid poverty as well as a number of other very undesirable outcomes. As a result, it is very common to see people choosing a portfolio with a high proportion of stocks and a low proportion of bonds when they are young before switching over to a portfolio with a low proportion of stocks and a high proportion of bonds when they are closing in on retirement age. This way, they can get higher growth in exchange for higher risks while counting on the passage of time to smooth over bad performances. After which, they can focus on protecting the wealth that they have saved up while still getting some growth out of it in the process.

Betting everything on a single stock is a much riskier plan. Something that is particularly true if interested individuals are going for the kind of perfect stock that Green described. Everything is dependent on interested individuals choosing the right stock at the right time, which is much easier said than done.

Most people can name one or two trends that are expected to become very important in the foreseeable future. For instance, most people can point out that even more positions are going to be automated as machine intelligence becomes more and more capable. Even if they can’t do that, finding out that information is as simple as submitting some searches on either Google or some other search engine. However, the problem is figuring out which start-ups are going to reap the most benefits from that trend based on very incomplete information. Even worse, people searching for the perfect stock are going to look for start-ups that manage to make it big rather than well-established companies that manage to become even more well-established, which is an additional layer of difficulty on top of everything else. In other words, everyone knows that Google and Amazon are going to benefit from automation, but no one can be sure which start-ups will become the next Google or Amazon because of automation until a relatively late stage in their development.

Of course, there are other stocks that can offer much more stability than successful start-ups. Chances are good that they won’t see their investors making massive returns on their investments, but they should still offer some returns because of their very nature as stocks. In particular, it is interesting to mention dividend aristocrats that have managed to increase their dividend payments for 25 consecutive years or longer. On top of that, there are even dividend kings, which have managed to do the same for 50 consecutive years or longer. Some of these stocks are attached to companies that have managed to perform just that well over just that long a period of time. Others are attached to companies with unusual business models that offer incredible stability while still being quite profitable. Whatever the case, these stocks are interesting for people planning for their retirement because their history of success suggests that they will remain so in the years and years to come. It isn’t quite a guarantee of returns because there is no such thing in the world of stocks, but it isn’t much of an exaggeration to call it the next best thing to it.

Having said that, even if people can put all of their money into a single stock, that doesn’t mean that they should be doing so. Fundamentally, people put their money in portfolios consisting of various stocks as well as other investments because their respective strengths can be used to compensate for each other’s weaknesses, thus enabling the portfolio to achieve higher returns while reducing risk in the process. As a result, when people choose to put all of their money in a single stock, they are effectively sacrificing some of the best tools that they have at their disposal for achieving their financial goals in exchange for an easier time setting up their portfolio as well as running their portfolio. That is very much not a good thing. Simply put, retirement planning is important, which is why interested individuals should put some serious time and effort into the whole process. That might not be easy, but in the end, their time and effort will be very much worthwhile.

Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Careers CEOs Companies Education Entertainment Legal Politics Science Sports Technology
Ruben Harris
10 Things You Didn’t Know about Ruben Harris
Virtual Reality
20 Things You Didn’t Know about Avataar
faith based apps
The Growing Business of Faith-Based Apps
Collectibles Credit Cards Investing Real Estate Stocks
Crypto Airdrops
What are Crypto Airdrops and How to Do They Work?
silver stocks
10 Silver Stocks Worth Looking Into
stock market
Is FSR Stock a Solid Long-Term Investment?
Aviation Boats Food & Drink Hotels Restaurants Yachts
Suntory Whiskey
Why is Suntory Hibiki Whiskey So Expensive
luxury travel
What’s It Like To Use The Concierge Service Knightsbridge Circle
Panther City, Fort Worth
The 20 Best Texas BBQ Joints in the State
BMW Bugatti Cadillac Ferrari Lamborghini Mercedes Porsche Rolls Royce
The 20 Best Station Wagons of the 80s
Carolina Squat
What Is a Carolina Squat and Is It Legal?
2022 Toyota Tacoma
A Closer Look at The 2022 Toyota Tacoma
BMW Motorcycles Buell Ducati Harley Davidson Honda Motorcycles Husqvarna Kawasaki KTM Triumph Motorcycles Yamaha
2002 Triumph Speed Triple
Remembering The 2002 Triumph Speed Triple
2021 Lexmoto LXR SE 125
A Closer Look at the 2021 Lexmoto LXR SE 125
A Closer Look at The 2022 Yamaha MT-10 SP
Electronics Fashion Health Home Jewelry Pens Sneakers Watches
Patek Philippe Calatrava Ref. 6119
A Closer Look at the Patek Philippe Calatrava Ref. 6119
Hermes Slim Squelette Lune Watch
A Closer Look at The Hermes Slim Squelette Lune Watch
Survival Kit
The 10 Best Survival Kits Money Can Buy
Mark Levin
How Mark Levin Achieved a Net Worth of $50 Million
Pink Floyd
How David Gilmour Achieved a Net Worth Of $180 Million
Dana Carvey
How Dana Carvey Achieved a Net Worth of $20 Million
Buddy Valastro
How Buddy Valastro Achieved a Net Worth of $10 Million