The Five Biggest Lawsuits Apple has Ever Faced

Apple is undeniably the most profitable technology company in the world. As you would expect with such great success, it has had its days in court, which are related to its business practices. Moreover, some of those cases involve lawsuits that involve millions of dollars, and in some cases, billions of dollars. It seems that even with such a profitable business strategy, Apple has not found a away to stay out of court. Read on to find what some of those cases have been about, and how Apple resolved some of them.

Apple Inc. Slowing down of iPhones

Apple is faced multiple suits after it said it had slowed down iPhones to preserve their batteries. In its defense, it said it did that to slow their power consumption, which would prevent them from shutting down abruptly. The phones that were targeted by the update are iPhone 6, iPhone 6S, Iphone SE, and iPhone 7. One of the lawsuit was stated to be close to $1 trillion. While Apple offered to reduce the cost of acquiring a new phone to $29.

Nokia Sued Apple Inc.

In October 2009, Nokia sued Apple claiming that Apple had benefited from the technology it had invented without paying for it. Apple countered sued a few months later in December 2009, claiming that Nokia had used 13 of its patented technologies without paying for them. Nokia decided to file a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, just a week after that claiming that almost all of Apple’s products have infringed on Nokia’s patents. The suits were settled after Apple agreed to pay Nokia some licensing fees.

Chinese Companies Sue Apple Inc.

Proview Electronics from China sued Apple for the word “iPad” claiming that Apple infringed on their trademark. The company said that although Apple had bought the trademark from them, they did not pay for the trademark when written in Chinese. The lawsuit estimated to be of over 1 billion was settled out of court with Apple paying $60 million, and buying the trademark.

Apple Corps and Apple Inc.

Apple Inc. was faced a trademark suit from Apple Corps, the company that Beatles record label regarding the word “Apple” and its association with music for a period of 30 years. They settled the case but Apple but faced with new suits from Apple Corps after it launched new features that infringed on earlier agreements. The suit was finally concluded in 2007 after they agreed that Apple Inc. would own most of the usage of the word Apple, while Apple Corps would be re-allocated a few licenses.

FBI and Apple Inc.

Following a terror attack, the FBI sent Apple a request to write new software. The FBI wanted to access the password-protected phones it had confiscated from the terror suspects. However, Apple declined because that was an infringement of the company’s free speech rights. Judge Sheri Pym as well as the “all Writs Act” backed the FBI’s suit; however, Apple was convinced it was within its rights and those of its customers to protect the encryption used in their phones. The Act allows the court to compel anyone to provide all writs that can aid the course of justice in their respective jurisdictions.

However, the judge must have no other legal options, and the target of the writ, in this case Apple, to be closely connected with the matter in court. However, Apple argued that they did not have much to do with the crime under investigation, and the Judge ignored other limits of the Act. However, the lawsuit was later dropped before Apple could head to the Supreme Court.

The FBI said that it had received help from a Third Party that helped it to unlock the phone and access the data inside. It however failed to reveal the Third Party Company that helped them access the password-locked phone. The inconclusive end of the suit failed to reveal what we should prioritize between security and privacy.

Conclusion

While Apple has faced numerous lawsuits with regard to its technology products, and how it does its business, it has also filed multiple lawsuits of its own against other companies. Some of the most notable ones being against Samsung, which dragged on for several years. Overall, it has lost some lawsuits and won others, and they lawsuits have not stopped or slowed down its success.


Add Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WeFox Group
20 Things You Didn’t Know About Wefox
Eric Breon
10 Things You Didn’t Know About Vacasa CEO Eric Breon
Iterable
20 Things You Didn’t Know About Iterable
Marcus Persson
How Notch Achieved a Net Worth of $1.6 Billion
Stock Market
10 Stocks to Consider if You Like AMD
Stocks
The 20 Most Undervalued Stocks of 2020
AT&T
10 Stocks to Consider If You like AT&T
The 10 Safest Blue-Chip Stocks to Own in 2020
Portugal
The 20 Best Places In the World for Expats to Live
The 20 Best Places to Live in London
The 20 Best Places to Live in Sacramento
Fairway
The 20 Best Places to Live in Kansas
Delray Beach
The 10 Best Seafood Restaurants in Delray Beach
Gulf Shores
The 20 Best Hotels in Gulf Shores
Disneyland
The 20 Best Things to Do in Orange County for First Timers
Albuquerque
The 20 Best Hotels in Albuquerque
Awesome Used Cars
20 Awesome Used Cars for Under $10,000
2020 Tesla Model S
The 20 Most Long Range Electric Cars for 2020
lambo
20 Reasons to Consider Getting a Certified Pre-Owned Car
Best 8-Passenger Cars
The 10 Best 8-Passenger Cars for 2020
Rado Watches
The 20 Best Rado Watches of All-Time
Flieger Cockpit one 1 Aviatis watch day date Automatic 704.21.18 L.01
The 10 Best Fortis Watches of All-Time
Mahogany
The 20 Best Original Grain Watches of All-Time
The 20 Best Running Watches Money Can Buy